Donovan v. Kansas City

Supreme Court

Donovan v. Kansas City

322 U.S. 707, 64 S. Ct. 1049

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedMay 1, 1944

DocketNo. 874

StatusPublished

This text of 322 U.S. 707 (Donovan v. Kansas City) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Donovan v. Kansas City, 322 U.S. 707, 64 S. Ct. 1049 (1944).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Thomas v. City o f Richmond, 12 Wall. 349, 356-57; Hedges v. Dixon County, 150 U. S. 182, and cases cited. Messrs. John G. Madden, Armwell L. Cooper, Cyrus Crane, Frank W. McAllister, William J. Carroll, Ralph M. Russell, and James E. Burke for appellant. Mr. Wm. E. Kemp for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Thomas v. City o f Richmond, 12 Wall. 349, 356-57; Hedges v. Dixon County, 150 U. S. 182, and cases cited. Messrs. John G. Madden, Armwell L. Cooper, Cyrus Crane, Frank W. McAllister, William J. Carroll, Ralph M. Russell, and James E. Burke for appellant. Mr. Wm. E. Kemp for appellee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

322 U.S. 707, 64 S. Ct. 1049, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donovan-v-kansas-city-scotus-1944.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack