Donovan v. Florida Parole Commission
This text of 72 So. 3d 339 (Donovan v. Florida Parole Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Michael S. Donovan seeks certiorari review of the circuit court order dismissing his petition for writ of habeas corpus in which he sought to challenge the order revoking his parole. The circuit court dismissed the habeas petition under the mistaken belief that Donovan should have filed a direct appeal of the order of revocation. A petition for writ of habeas corpus filed in the circuit court is the proper way to obtain review of an order revoking parole. Richardson v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 924 So.2d 908, 910 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) (“In lieu of a statutory right to an appeal, review of the [Parole] Commission’s orders remains available by petitions for habeas corpus or mandamus filed in the circuit court.”). Accordingly, in dismissing the petition, the circuit court departed from the essential requirements of law and deprived Donovan of the procedural due process to which he is entitled. See generally Sheley v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 720 So.2d 216, 217-18 (Fla.1998). We therefore grant the petition for writ of certiorari and quash the order dismissing Donovan’s petition for writ of habeas corpus.
Granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
72 So. 3d 339, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 16984, 2011 WL 5067666, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donovan-v-florida-parole-commission-fladistctapp-2011.