Donovan v. Donovan

Superior Court of Delaware

Donovan v. Donovan

77 A. 765, 24 Del. 321, 1 Boyce 321, 1910 Del. LEXIS 39

CourtSuperior Court of Delaware

DecidedApril 13, 1910

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 77 A. 765 (Donovan v. Donovan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Donovan v. Donovan, 77 A. 765, 24 Del. 321, 1 Boyce 321, 1910 Del. LEXIS 39 (Del. Ct. App. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

Pennewill, C. J.,

delivering the opinion of the Court:

We have given this motion some consideration since the rule was issued and have attentively listened to the authorities cited by both sides to-day.

We may say that we think the citations in support of the rule do not impress us as being much in point. One or more of the cases are cases of appeal, where the appeal was taken before the death of the party, and others involve matters incidental to the divorce, such as alimony, etc. and do not involve the question raised here, to wit, the dissolution of the marriage tie; and certainly of the cases cited not one is like the present or closely analoous thereto.

The section of the statute under consideration is as follows:

“A decree nisi shall become absolute after the expiration of [323]*323one year from the entry thereof, unless appealed from or proceedings for review are pending, or the court before the expiration of said period for sufficient cause, upon its own motion, or upon the application of any party, whether interested or not, otherwise orders; and at the expiration of one year such final and absolute decree shall then be entered upon application to the court by the plaintiff, unless prior to that time cause be shown to the contrary”. Sec. 23, Chap. 22, Vol. 24, Laws of Delaware, 625.

It appears from the petition filed that the plaintiff in the action for divorce died after the decree nisi was made and within the year next following said decree, and there is therefore now no husband or wife to be divorced. There is no marital relation existing between the parties, and no parties to the action of divorce and upon which the decree may be operative. There is no plaintiff in the case who can make the motion for a final decree as required by the statute. We are therefore of the opinion that the husband, the plaintiff, being deceased, this Court has no power, upon the application of the administrator, or heir-at-law or both, to grant a final decree. The rule is discharged.

Mr. Richardson:—Does it follow that the decree nisi is vacated?

Pennewill, C. J.,:—The only thing before the Court is the final decree. The motion here is that we make the decree nisi final, and that we refuse. That is all there is before us in this application.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pennewill, C. J.,

delivering the opinion of the Court:

We have given this motion some consideration since the rule was issued and have attentively listened to the authorities cited by both sides to-day.

We may say that we think the citations in support of the rule do not impress us as being much in point. One or more of the cases are cases of appeal, where the appeal was taken before the death of the party, and others involve matters incidental to the divorce, such as alimony, etc. and do not involve the question raised here, to wit, the dissolution of the marriage tie; and certainly of the cases cited not one is like the present or closely analoous thereto.

The section of the statute under consideration is as follows:

“A decree nisi shall become absolute after the expiration of [323]*323one year from the entry thereof, unless appealed from or proceedings for review are pending, or the court before the expiration of said period for sufficient cause, upon its own motion, or upon the application of any party, whether interested or not, otherwise orders; and at the expiration of one year such final and absolute decree shall then be entered upon application to the court by the plaintiff, unless prior to that time cause be shown to the contrary”. Sec. 23, Chap. 22, Vol. 24, Laws of Delaware, 625.

It appears from the petition filed that the plaintiff in the action for divorce died after the decree nisi was made and within the year next following said decree, and there is therefore now no husband or wife to be divorced. There is no marital relation existing between the parties, and no parties to the action of divorce and upon which the decree may be operative. There is no plaintiff in the case who can make the motion for a final decree as required by the statute. We are therefore of the opinion that the husband, the plaintiff, being deceased, this Court has no power, upon the application of the administrator, or heir-at-law or both, to grant a final decree. The rule is discharged.

Mr. Richardson:—Does it follow that the decree nisi is vacated?

Pennewill, C. J.,:—The only thing before the Court is the final decree. The motion here is that we make the decree nisi final, and that we refuse. That is all there is before us in this application.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

77 A. 765, 24 Del. 321, 1 Boyce 321, 1910 Del. LEXIS 39, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donovan-v-donovan-delsuperct-1910.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack