Donovan v. Brown

D.C. Circuit

Donovan v. Brown

124 F.2d 295, 75 U.S. App. D.C. 93, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 2474

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedDecember 10, 1941

DocketNo. 7770

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 124 F.2d 295 (Donovan v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Donovan v. Brown, 124 F.2d 295, 75 U.S. App. D.C. 93, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 2474 (D.C. Cir. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On this appeal, appellant objects to the trial court’s charge to the jury, but the so-called bill of exceptions does not indicate that he did so at the trial. The objection comes too late. Martin v. Washington Times Co., 67 App.D.C. 11, 89 F.2d 230. It is a salutary rule that errors which the trial court is given no opportunity to correct will not, in general, be considered on appeal.

Affirmed.

GRONER, C. J., took no part in the consideration and decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

On this appeal, appellant objects to the trial court’s charge to the jury, but the so-called bill of exceptions does not indicate that he did so at the trial. The objection comes too late. Martin v. Washington Times Co., 67 App.D.C. 11, 89 F.2d 230. It is a salutary rule that errors which the trial court is given no opportunity to correct will not, in general, be considered on appeal.

Affirmed.

GRONER, C. J., took no part in the consideration and decision of this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

124 F.2d 295, 75 U.S. App. D.C. 93, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 2474, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donovan-v-brown-cadc-1941.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack