Donovan v. Brown

124 F.2d 295, 75 U.S. App. D.C. 93, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 2474
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided December 10, 1941·No. No. 7770·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On this appeal, appellant objects to the trial court’s charge to the jury, but the so-called bill of exceptions does not indicate that he did so at the trial. The objection comes too late. Martin v. Washington Times Co., 67 App.D.C. 11, 89 F.2d 230. It is a salutary rule that errors which the trial court is given no opportunity to correct will not, in general, be considered on appeal.

Affirmed.

GRONER, C. J., took no part in the consideration and decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Donovan v. Brown, 124 F.2d 295, 75 U.S. App. D.C. 93, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 2474 (D.C. Cir. 1941).

124 F.2d 295 (Donovan v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ohio Valley Construction Co., Inc. v. Dew
354 A.2d 518 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1976)
Hassler v. District of Columbia
122 A.2d 827 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1956)
Henderson v. Allison
44 A.2d 220 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1945)
Taylor v. Yellow Cab Co.
31 A.2d 683 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1943)