Donophan v. Sullivan
This text of 932 F.2d 959 (Donophan v. Sullivan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
932 F.2d 959
Donophan (Bruce Louis), Riley (James), Bowman (Hal), Andrews
(David), Welsh (Edwin, Jr.)
v.
Sullivan (John, Commissioner), Redman (Walter), Gulledge
(Thomas), Caulk (Rodney), Ewing (John), Shockley (Richard),
Dixon (Floyd), Bankus (Michael), Person (David), Burris
(Elizabeth), Ferguson (Mail Room Off.), Bartsch (John),
Hilts (Edna), Hobler (Bruce), Wolfson (Bob), Russemm
(Norris), Shieker (Bruce), Hall (Charles), Spencer
(Alexander), Colburn (Pop), Segars (Clyde), Bourne
NO. 89-3740
United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.
APR 15, 1991
Appeal From: D.Del.,
Farnan, J.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
932 F.2d 959, 1991 WL 69706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donophan-v-sullivan-ca3-1991.