Donohue v. Tompkins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Donohue v. Tompkins

16 A.D.2d 825, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9441

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 28, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 16 A.D.2d 825 (Donohue v. Tompkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Donohue v. Tompkins, 16 A.D.2d 825, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9441 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff, a passenger in an automobile owned and operated by defendant Warren H. Tompkins, as a result of its collision with an automobile operated by defendant Ott and owned by defendant Lockwood, Kessler & Bartlett, Inc., the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered October 10, 1961 on a jury’s verdict after trial, dismissing the complaint as against the defendants Warren H. Tompkins and William M. Tompkins, Inc. With respect to the other defendants, the action had been settled upon a conditional release; and the trial had proceeded against the two Tompkins defendants only. Judgment affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Beldock, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff, a passenger in an automobile owned and operated by defendant Warren H. Tompkins, as a result of its collision with an automobile operated by defendant Ott and owned by defendant Lockwood, Kessler & Bartlett, Inc., the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered October 10, 1961 on a jury’s verdict after trial, dismissing the complaint as against the defendants Warren H. Tompkins and William M. Tompkins, Inc. With respect to the other defendants, the action had been settled upon a conditional release; and the trial had proceeded against the two Tompkins defendants only. Judgment affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Beldock, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 A.D.2d 825, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9441, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donohue-v-tompkins-nyappdiv-1962.