Donohue v. Still

Fourth Circuit

Donohue v. Still

582 F. App'x 205

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedAugust 26, 2014

DocketNo. 14-6915

StatusPublished

This text of 582 F. App'x 205 (Donohue v. Still) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Donohue v. Still, 582 F. App'x 205 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

John Patrick Donohue appeals the district court’s order denying his second motion to amend his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint that the district court dismissed without prejudice as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Donohue v. Still, No. 7:14-cv-00151-GEC-RSB (E.D.Va. May 15, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

John Patrick Donohue appeals the district court’s order denying his second motion to amend his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint that the district court dismissed without prejudice as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Donohue v. Still, No. 7:14-cv-00151-GEC-RSB (E.D.Va. May 15, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

582 F. App'x 205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donohue-v-still-ca4-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack