Donohue v. Still

Fourth Circuit

Donohue v. Still

582 F. App'x 205

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 26, 2014·No. No. 14-6915·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

John Patrick Donohue appeals the district court’s order denying his second motion to amend his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint that the district court dismissed without prejudice as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Donohue v. Still, No. 7:14-cv-00151-GEC-RSB (E.D.Va. May 15, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

John Patrick Donohue appeals the district court’s order denying his second motion to amend his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint that the district court dismissed without prejudice as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Donohue v. Still, No. 7:14-cv-00151-GEC-RSB (E.D.Va. May 15, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Donohue v. Still, 582 F. App'x 205 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

582 F. App'x 205 (Donohue v. Still) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related