Donohue v. Rosenthal

Oregon Supreme Court

Donohue v. Rosenthal

34 P.2d 316, 147 Or. 408, 1934 Ore. LEXIS 129

CourtOregon Supreme Court

DecidedJune 6, 1934

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 34 P.2d 316 (Donohue v. Rosenthal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Donohue v. Rosenthal, 34 P.2d 316, 147 Or. 408, 1934 Ore. LEXIS 129 (Or. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

BELT, J.

This suit challenges the constitutionality of certain parts of chapter 166, Oregon Laws, 1933, regulating advertising by dentists. It is a companion case of Semler v. Oregon State Board of Dental Examiners. All the contentions made by appellant herein have been decided adversely to him in the Semler case.

It follows that the decree dismissing this suit is affirmed. Defendants are entitled to costs and disbursements.

Rossman, J., not sitting. Campbell, J., concurs in the result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BELT, J.

This suit challenges the constitutionality of certain parts of chapter 166, Oregon Laws, 1933, regulating advertising by dentists. It is a companion case of Semler v. Oregon State Board of Dental Examiners. All the contentions made by appellant herein have been decided adversely to him in the Semler case.

It follows that the decree dismissing this suit is affirmed. Defendants are entitled to costs and disbursements.

Rossman, J., not sitting. Campbell, J., concurs in the result.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 P.2d 316, 147 Or. 408, 1934 Ore. LEXIS 129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donohue-v-rosenthal-or-1934.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack