Donohue v. New York State Police

228 N.E.2d 409, 19 N.Y.2d 954, 281 N.Y.S.2d 357, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1433
New York Court of Appeals·Decided May 31, 1967·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order reversed upon the ground that the penalty imposed upon appellant is excessive as a matter of law (CPLR 7803, subd. 3; see Matter of Bell v. Waterfront Comm., 20 N Y 2d 54 [also decided today]; Matter of Walker v. Murphy, 15 N Y 2d 650, 651). His discharge is annulled and the proceeding remanded to respondent on the dissenting opinion at the Appellate Division for a determination in accordance therewith (25 AD 2d908).

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Van Voobhis, Burke, Bergan, Keating and Breitel. Judge Soileppi dissents and votes to affirm upon the opinion at the Appellate Division.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Donohue v. New York State Police, 228 N.E.2d 409, 19 N.Y.2d 954, 281 N.Y.S.2d 357, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1433 (N.Y. 1967).

228 N.E.2d 409 (Donohue v. New York State Police) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pietranico v. Ambach
82 A.D.2d 625 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Yodice v. Shaw
58 A.D.2d 730 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)