Home/Supreme Court/Donohue v. Maine

Donohue v. Maine

269 U.S. 531, 46 S. Ct. 22
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 19, 1925
DocketNo. 45; No. 46
StatusPublished

This text of 269 U.S. 531 (Donohue v. Maine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Donohue v. Maine, 269 U.S. 531, 46 S. Ct. 22 (1925).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdic[532]*532tion upon the. authority of (1) section 237 of the Judicial Code as amended by the act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, sec. 2, 39 Stat. 726 ; (2) United States v. Lanza, 260 U. S. 377, 382; Twining v. New Jersey, 211 U. S. 78, 93; Barron v. Baltimore, 7 Pet. 243.

Messrs. Herbert E. Holmes and E. N.- Pike for plaintiffs in error. Messrs. Bansford W. Shaw and Edward W. Wheeler for defendant in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barron Ex Rel. Tiernan v. Mayor of Baltimore
32 U.S. 243 (Supreme Court, 1833)
Twining v. New Jersey
211 U.S. 78 (Supreme Court, 1908)
United States v. Lanza
260 U.S. 377 (Supreme Court, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
269 U.S. 531, 46 S. Ct. 22, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donohue-v-maine-scotus-1925.