Donohue v. La Pierre

99 A.D.2d 570, 471 N.Y.S.2d 396, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16805
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 12, 1984
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 99 A.D.2d 570 (Donohue v. La Pierre) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Donohue v. La Pierre, 99 A.D.2d 570, 471 N.Y.S.2d 396, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16805 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term (Hughes, J.), entered February 16, 1983 in Albany County, which granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground of lack of jurisdiction and denied plaintiff’s cross motion to dismiss the third and fifth affirmative defenses in defendant’s answer. The sole issue in this personal injury case resulting from an automobile accident is whether service of process pursuant to CPLR 308 (subd 2) was proper where the process server mailed a copy of the summons to defendant addressed to him at “1950 Central Avenue, Colonie, New York”. Special Term found that since there is no post office or zip code for the Town of Colonie, New York, plaintiff failed to comply with the statute, requiring dismissal for lack of jurisdiction. It appears that defendant resided at 1950 Central Avenue, but that the correct mailing address for that street number is “Albany, New York 12205”. Special Term correctly held the phrase “ ‘last known residence’ ” specified for mailing in CPLR 308 (subd 2), to be synonomous with the term “ ‘last known address’ ” (see Feinstein v Bergner, 48 NY2d 234, 240, n 4). It is conceded that provisions of the statute must be strictly complied with to properly effectuate service (Glikman v Horowitz, 66 AD2d 814). This includes compliance with both delivery and mailing (Booth v Lipton, 87 AD2d 856). However, we do not believe that the mailing requirement of the statute is only satisfied by using the exact mailing address pursuant to the regulations and organization of the United States Postal Service. In this case, it is unquestioned that defendant lived at 1950 Central Avenue in the Town of Colonie, New York, and not in the City of Albany. Thus, the address to which the summons was mailed was correct. Special Term’s decision is based on the fact that, for reasons best known to itself, the United States Postal Service does not have a post office for the Town of Colonie, but routes mail for the residents of that town through post offices in several neighboring communities.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rattner v. Fessler
163 N.Y.S.3d 575 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Youngstown Tube Co. v. Russo
120 A.D.3d 1409 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Gray-Joseph v. Shuhai Liu
90 A.D.3d 988 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. v. Schuh
48 A.D.3d 838 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Ludmer v. Hasan
33 A.D.3d 594 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. Vanvliet
24 A.D.3d 906 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Richardson v. Richardson
309 A.D.2d 795 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Citibank v. Harris
264 A.D.2d 377 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Avakian v. De Los Santos
183 A.D.2d 687 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Taft v. Lesko
182 A.D.2d 1008 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Reliance Audio Visual Corp. v. Bronson
141 Misc. 2d 671 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1988)
In re Foley
140 A.D.2d 892 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Donaldson v. Melville
124 A.D.2d 361 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
99 A.D.2d 570, 471 N.Y.S.2d 396, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16805, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donohue-v-la-pierre-nyappdiv-1984.