Donohue v. INTERMODAL TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC.

706 N.W.2d 728, 474 Mich. 951, 2005 Mich. LEXIS 2605
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided December 9, 2005·No. 128416·Published

Opinion

706 N.W.2d 728 (2005)
474 Mich. 951

Sharon DONOHUE and Kevin Donohue, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
INTERMODAL TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

Docket No. 128416, COA No. 249700.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

December 9, 2005.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 11, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

MARILYN J. KELLY, J., dissents and states as follows:

I would grant leave to appeal in accordance with Judge White's dissent. There was a factual question about age discrimination.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Donohue v. INTERMODAL TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC., 706 N.W.2d 728, 474 Mich. 951, 2005 Mich. LEXIS 2605 (Mich. 2005).

706 N.W.2d 728 (Donohue v. INTERMODAL TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.