Donohue v. INTERMODAL TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC.
This text of 706 N.W.2d 728 (Donohue v. INTERMODAL TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Sharon DONOHUE and Kevin Donohue, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
INTERMODAL TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 11, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MARILYN J. KELLY, J., dissents and states as follows:
I would grant leave to appeal in accordance with Judge White's dissent. There was a factual question about age discrimination.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
706 N.W.2d 728, 474 Mich. 951, 2005 Mich. LEXIS 2605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donohue-v-intermodal-transportation-services-inc-mich-2005.