Donohue v. Hochul
This text of Donohue v. Hochul (Donohue v. Hochul) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK PATRICK DONOHUE, etal. Plaintiffs, 21 CIVIL 8463 (JPO) -against- JUDGMENT KATHLEEN HOCHUL, et al.,
Defendants. nen nen eK It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated February 23, 2022, the City Defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint is granted, and the complaint is dismissed in its entirety. Because the defects with the complaint are substantive, and amendment would be futile, the federal claims are dismissed with prejudice. See Kim v. Kimm, 884 F.3d 98, 105-06 (2d Cir. 2018). The state law claims are dismissed without prejudice to refiling in state court. Plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction is denied; accordingly, this case is closed.
Dated: New York, New York February 23, 2022
RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Coup? Daw) I Tears Dal) de
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Donohue v. Hochul, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donohue-v-hochul-nysd-2022.