Donohue, Tierney & Isengert Brewing Co. v. Fitchburg R. Co.

23 N.Y.S. 1146, 67 Hun 653, 51 N.Y. St. Rep. 940
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 2, 1893
StatusPublished

This text of 23 N.Y.S. 1146 (Donohue, Tierney & Isengert Brewing Co. v. Fitchburg R. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Donohue, Tierney & Isengert Brewing Co. v. Fitchburg R. Co., 23 N.Y.S. 1146, 67 Hun 653, 51 N.Y. St. Rep. 940 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).

Opinion

HERRICK, J.

This case presents the same facts as the case of Hoffmann against the same defendant, (22 N. Y. Supp. 463,) the plaintiff in this action being the employer of the plaintiff in that. Both actions arise out of the same accident, and the conclusions arrived at in the Hoffmann Case require that the judgment herein should be reversed, and a new trial ordered, costs to abide the event. Let an order be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hoffmann v. Fitchburgh Railroad
22 N.Y.S. 463 (New York Supreme Court, 1893)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 N.Y.S. 1146, 67 Hun 653, 51 N.Y. St. Rep. 940, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donohue-tierney-isengert-brewing-co-v-fitchburg-r-co-nysupct-1893.