Donohue, Tierney & Isengert Brewing Co. v. Fitchburg R. Co.
23 N.Y.S. 1146, 67 Hun 653, 51 N.Y. St. Rep. 940
Opinion
This case presents the same facts as the case of Hoffmann against the same defendant, (22 N. Y. Supp. 463,) the plaintiff in this action being the employer of the plaintiff in that. Both actions arise out of the same accident, and the conclusions arrived at in the Hoffmann Case require that the judgment herein should be reversed, and a new trial ordered, costs to abide the event. Let an order be entered accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Donohue, Tierney & Isengert Brewing Co. v. Fitchburg R. Co., 23 N.Y.S. 1146, 67 Hun 653, 51 N.Y. St. Rep. 940 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).
23 N.Y.S. 1146 (Donohue, Tierney & Isengert Brewing Co. v. Fitchburg R. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hoffmann v. Fitchburgh Railroad
22 N.Y.S. 463 (New York Supreme Court, 1893)