Donoho v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

699 N.W.2d 301, 472 Mich. 944
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Donoho v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 474 Mich. 1057
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 2005·No. 127537·Published

Opinion

699 N.W.2d 301 (2005)

Donoho
v.
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

No. 127537.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

July 1, 2005.

SC: 127537, COA: 256525.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 29, 2004 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), we direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action permitted by MCR 7.302(G)(1). The parties shall include among the issues to be addressed at oral argument the correct interpretation of MCL 418.315(1). The parties may file supplemental briefs within 28 days of the date of this order, but they should avoid submitting mere restatement of arguments made in application papers.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Donoho v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 699 N.W.2d 301, 472 Mich. 944 (Mich. 2005).

699 N.W.2d 301 (Donoho v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.