D'Onofrio v. New York City Employees' Retirement System
This text of 270 A.D.2d 49 (D'Onofrio v. New York City Employees' Retirement System) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.), entered October 30, 1998, which dismissed the petition brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul the determination of respondent New York City Employees’ Retirement System denying petitioner’s application for accident disability retirement benefits, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Respondent’s determination, that petitioner’s slip and fall on accumulated water while checking a steam leak was not an “accident” qualifying him for accident disability benefits because the circumstances that caused his fall were reasonably within the risks involved in the performance of his routine duties as a stationary engineer, was rationally based and, accordingly, may not be judicially disturbed (see, Matter of Kehoe v City of New York, 81 NY2d 815, 816-817). The determination may also be sustained upon the medical proof that the claimed disability was the result of a chronic condition entirely unrelated to the trauma connected with this fall. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Wallach, Andrias and Friedman, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
270 A.D.2d 49, 704 N.Y.S.2d 232, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donofrio-v-new-york-city-employees-retirement-system-nyappdiv-2000.