Donny W. Nevels v. Joyce B. Nevels-Miller
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-20-00154-CV ___________________________
DONNY W. NEVELS, Appellant
V.
JOYCE B. NEVELS-MILLER, Appellee
On Appeal from the 233rd District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 233-652702-18
Before Kerr, Birdwell, and Bassel, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT
On October 28, 2020, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as
the appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could
dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days, appellant filed with
the court an appellant’s brief and an accompanying motion reasonably explaining the
brief’s untimely filing and why an extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b),
38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have received no response.
Because appellant has failed to file a brief even after we afforded an
opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of
prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
Per Curiam
Delivered: December 10, 2020
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Donny W. Nevels v. Joyce B. Nevels-Miller (Donny W. Nevels v. Joyce B. Nevels-Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.