Donnie Wade Harrell v. Woods, et al.

M.D. Georgia

Donnie Wade Harrell v. Woods, et al.

District Court, M.D. Georgia·Decided August 10, 2026·No. 1:24-cv-00199·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ALBANY DIVISION

DONNIE WADE HARRELL, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : CASE NO.: 1:24-CV-00199 (WLS-AGH) : WOODS, et al., : : Defendant. : : ORDER Before the Court is a Recommendation (Doc. 30) from United States Magistrate Judge Amelia G. Helmick. In it, Judge Helmick recommends that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 21) and Motion for Ruling (Doc. 29) be granted. (Doc. 30). The Recommendation, filed on July 21, 2026, gave Harrell 14 days to object but he did not. Therefore, the Court reviews the Recommendation for plain error and manifest injustice. See United States v. Aponte, 461 F. App’x 828, 830 n.2 (11th Cir. 2012). Upon full review and consideration of the Record, the Court finds neither plain error nor manifest injustice in Judge Helmick’s Recommendation. The Recommendation (Doc. 30) is thus ACCEPTED, ADOPTED, and made the Order of this Court, for reason of the findings made and reasons stated in it. Hence Harrell’s Complaint is DISMISSED, with prejudice.

SO ORDERED, this 10th day of August 2026.

/s/ W. Louis Sands W. LOUIS SANDS, SR. JUDGE UNITED STATESDISTRICT COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ALBANY DIVISION

DONNIE WADE HARRELL, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : CASE NO.: 1:24-CV-00199 (WLS-AGH) : WOODS, et al., : : Defendant. : : ORDER Before the Court is a Recommendation (Doc. 30) from United States Magistrate Judge Amelia G. Helmick. In it, Judge Helmick recommends that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 21) and Motion for Ruling (Doc. 29) be granted. (Doc. 30). The Recommendation, filed on July 21, 2026, gave Harrell 14 days to object but he did not. Therefore, the Court reviews the Recommendation for plain error and manifest injustice. See United States v. Aponte, 461 F. App’x 828, 830 n.2 (11th Cir. 2012). Upon full review and consideration of the Record, the Court finds neither plain error nor manifest injustice in Judge Helmick’s Recommendation. The Recommendation (Doc. 30) is thus ACCEPTED, ADOPTED, and made the Order of this Court, for reason of the findings made and reasons stated in it. Hence Harrell’s Complaint is DISMISSED, with prejudice.

SO ORDERED, this 10th day of August 2026.

/s/ W. Louis Sands W. LOUIS SANDS, SR. JUDGE UNITED STATESDISTRICT COURT

Donnie Wade Harrell v. Woods, et al., (M.D. Ga. 2026).

Pincite

Donnie Wade Harrell v. Woods, et al. (Donnie Wade Harrell v. Woods, et al.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related