Donnie Propes v. George Wilson and Warden Gene Scroggy
This text of 833 F.2d 1013 (Donnie Propes v. George Wilson and Warden Gene Scroggy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Donnie PROPES, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
George WILSON and Warden Gene Scroggy, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 87-5547.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Nov. 20, 1987.
Before KRUPANSKY and RYAN, Circuit Judges, and CONTIE, Senior Circuit Judge.
ORDER
This appeal has been referred to a panel of this court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination of the record and briefs, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a).
It is concluded upon a careful review of the record that the district court properly granted summary judgment for defendants. The material facts, read in the light most favorable to plaintiff, cannot support a cause of action under the civil rights act. Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 106 (1976).
Therefore, the judgment of the district court is affirmed pursuant to Rule 9(b)(5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
833 F.2d 1013, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 15339, 1987 WL 38999, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donnie-propes-v-george-wilson-and-warden-gene-scroggy-ca6-1987.