Donner v. Brescher
696 So. 2d 536, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 7776, 1997 WL 375084
Opinion
Pursuant to an appropriate petition for writ of prohibition we issued a rule to show cause as it appeared that a meritorious motion to recuse the respondent had been duly filed in the circuit court. See Breakstone v. MacKenzie, 561 So.2d 1164 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), approved in part and quashed in part, 565 So.2d 1332 (Fla.1990). No response having been filed, we now make the rule absolute in prohibition. It should not be necessary to issue a formal rule. See Snow v. Fowler, 662 So.2d 1295 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995), rev. denied, 671 So.2d 788 (Fla.1996).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Donner v. Brescher, 696 So. 2d 536, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 7776, 1997 WL 375084 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).
696 So. 2d 536 (Donner v. Brescher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Snow v. Fowler
662 So. 2d 1295 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
MacKenzie v. Super Kids Bargain Store, Inc.
565 So. 2d 1332 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)
Breakstone v. MacKenzie
561 So. 2d 1164 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)