Donnelly v. Wright Aeronautical Corp.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Donnelly v. Wright Aeronautical Corp.

49 A.2d 17, 134 N.J.L. 480, 1946 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 83

DecidedOctober 1, 1946

StatusPublished

This text of 49 A.2d 17 (Donnelly v. Wright Aeronautical Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Donnelly v. Wright Aeronautical Corp., 49 A.2d 17, 134 N.J.L. 480, 1946 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 83 (N.J. 1946).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Colie, J.

The single question for determination is whether the evidence warranted the court below in finding that the injured employee sustained a loss of vision in his left eye amounting to 30%. Dr. Atwood called on behalf of the injured workman found a 20% loss of vision which was due to a scar on the cornea; Dr. Lobsenz on behalf of the employer testified that “ten per cent, 'disability could be allowed considering the disfigurement caused by the scar, and ray estimate was ten per cent, disability.” While differing greatly as to the extent of the disfigurement involved, the case of Everhart v. Newark Cleaning and Dyeing Co., 120 N. J. L. 474, is authority for an award based upon disfigurement. In the instant ease there was evidence of a 10% disability based solely upon disfigurement in addition to the 20% loss of vision. In this situation we are of the opinion that the evidence fully supports the award in the Bureau and its affirmance by the Common Pleas.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Colie, J.

The single question for determination is whether the evidence warranted the court below in finding that the injured employee sustained a loss of vision in his left eye amounting to 30%. Dr. Atwood called on behalf of the injured workman found a 20% loss of vision which was due to a scar on the cornea; Dr. Lobsenz on behalf of the employer testified that “ten per cent, 'disability could be allowed considering the disfigurement caused by the scar, and ray estimate was ten per cent, disability.” While differing greatly as to the extent of the disfigurement involved, the case of Everhart v. Newark Cleaning and Dyeing Co., 120 N. J. L. 474, is authority for an award based upon disfigurement. In the instant ease there was evidence of a 10% disability based solely upon disfigurement in addition to the 20% loss of vision. In this situation we are of the opinion that the evidence fully supports the award in the Bureau and its affirmance by the Common Pleas.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 A.2d 17, 134 N.J.L. 480, 1946 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 83, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donnelly-v-wright-aeronautical-corp-nj-1946.