Donnelly v. United Fruit Co.

4 A.D.2d 855, 166 N.Y.S.2d 392, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4446

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed. No opinion. Motion for summary judgment granted. The pleadings and affidavits establish that the relationship of master and servant terminated prior to the commencement of this [856]*856action and plaintiff does not seek the revival thereof. There is no necessity for resort to a declaratory judgment because no disputed jural relation will be stabilized or clarified. (Somberg v. Somberg, 263 N. Y. 1; Segal V. Associated Agents of America, 91 N. Y. S. 2d 49, affd. without opinion 276 App. Div. 896.) Furthermore, a threatened libel will not be restrained. (Marlin Fire Arms Co. v. Shields, 171 N. Y. 384.) The order appealed from therefore is reversed and defendant’s motion for summary judgment granted. This disposition is without prejudice to any other remedies of which plaintiff may be advised. Settle order on notice. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Frank, Valente and McNally, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Donnelly v. United Fruit Co., 4 A.D.2d 855, 166 N.Y.S.2d 392, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4446 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1957).

4 A.D.2d 855 (Donnelly v. United Fruit Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Somberg v. Somberg
188 N.E. 137 (New York Court of Appeals, 1933)
Marlin Fire Arms Co. v. . Shields
64 N.E. 163 (New York Court of Appeals, 1902)