Donnelly v. Sloat

113 A.D. 919, 100 N.Y.S. 1113

This text of 113 A.D. 919 (Donnelly v. Sloat) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Donnelly v. Sloat, 113 A.D. 919, 100 N.Y.S. 1113 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).

Opinion

Judgment of the County Court of Suffolk county reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event, the respondent conceding in his brief that reversible error was committed by the trial court. Hirsehberg, P. J., Woodward, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
113 A.D. 919, 100 N.Y.S. 1113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donnelly-v-sloat-nyappdiv-1906.