Donnelly v. Morris

Superior Court of New York

Donnelly v. Morris

13 N.Y.S. 427, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1154

CourtThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo

DecidedJanuary 5, 1891

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 13 N.Y.S. 427 (Donnelly v. Morris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Donnelly v. Morris, 13 N.Y.S. 427, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1154 (superctny 1891).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff did not establish any equity upon the motion. The supposed equity was founded upon the application by defendant to the payment of the note of partnership assets, or the defendant’s breach of his agreement to apply those assets to the payment of the note. Either contingency does not create an equity. All of it is that it is inconvenient to ascertain the facts, and to go to Massachusetts to defend the action there. This is not ground of equitable interference. Order affirmed, with $10 costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff did not establish any equity upon the motion. The supposed equity was founded upon the application by defendant to the payment of the note of partnership assets, or the defendant’s breach of his agreement to apply those assets to the payment of the note. Either contingency does not create an equity. All of it is that it is inconvenient to ascertain the facts, and to go to Massachusetts to defend the action there. This is not ground of equitable interference. Order affirmed, with $10 costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 N.Y.S. 427, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donnelly-v-morris-superctny-1891.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack