Donnelly v. Gur-Arie
This text of 93 A.D.3d 464 (Donnelly v. Gur-Arie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, Queens County
We decline to disturb the pendente lite award that only required defendant to resume making payments that he had [465]*465previously made. There was no showing of either exigent circumstances or a failure by the motion court to consider the factors set forth in Domestic Relations Law § 236 (B) (6), such as the parties’ respective incomes and their preseparation standard of living (see e.g. Strauss v Saadatmand, 89 AD3d 415 [2011]). Concur — Tom, J.P., Andrias, Catterson, Moskowitz and Román, JJ. [Prior Case History: 30 Misc 3d 1214(A), 2011 NY Slip Op 50063(U).]
This appeal was transferred to this Court from the Appellate Division, Second Department.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
93 A.D.3d 464, 939 N.Y.S.2d 700, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donnelly-v-gur-arie-nyappdiv-2012.