Donnelly v. District of Columbia
119 U.S. 339, 7 S. Ct. 276, 30 L. Ed. 465, 1886 U.S. LEXIS 1994
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The judgment in this case is affirmed on the authority of Looney v. The District of Columbia, 113 U. S. 258. It having been found as a fact by the court below that no mistake had been made in reducing the contract to writing, no' questions are presented in this court on that branch of the case.
Affirmed:
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Donnelly v. District of Columbia, 119 U.S. 339, 7 S. Ct. 276, 30 L. Ed. 465, 1886 U.S. LEXIS 1994 (1886).
119 U.S. 339 (Donnelly v. District of Columbia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Alexander-Seewald Co. v. Questa
175 S.E.2d 92 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1970)
Plitt v. Stonebraker
195 F.2d 39 (D.C. Circuit, 1952)
General American Tank Car Corp. v. Goree
296 F. 32 (Fourth Circuit, 1924)