Donnelly v. County of Nassau

46 Misc. 2d 895, 261 N.Y.S.2d 192, 1965 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1835
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided June 2, 1965·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The report sought in item “ 1 ” is a public record available to plaintiffs and therefore it is not necessary that defendant be required to supply a copy to plaintiffs (Benson v. Murr, 23 A D 2d 756).

The documents sought in item u 2 ” include a memorandum made by the police officer involved in the accident and the memorandum and report of investigation made by the police sergeant, which were forwarded to the County Attorney. Under the circumstances of this case these writings correspond, respectively, to reports made to an insurance carrier under a liability policy by an insured and by an investigator, and are therefore exempted from disclosure under CPLR 3101 (subd. [d]) as material prepared for litigation (Finegold v. Lewis, 22 A D 2d 447; Kandel v. Tocher, 22 A D 2d 513).

The order should be unanimously modified by granting the protective order sought as to items “ 1 ” and “ 2 ” of plaintiffs’ demand, and as so modified, affirmed, without costs.

Concur — McDonald, Schwartzwald and Groat, JJ.

Order modified, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Donnelly v. County of Nassau, 46 Misc. 2d 895, 261 N.Y.S.2d 192, 1965 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1835 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

46 Misc. 2d 895 (Donnelly v. County of Nassau) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Eifert v. Bush
27 A.D.2d 950 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1967)
Eifert v. Bush
51 Misc. 2d 248 (New York Supreme Court, 1966)