Donnellon v. Tofany

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Donnellon v. Tofany

31 A.D.2d 941, 299 N.Y.S.2d 805, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4447

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 10, 1969

StatusPublished

This text of 31 A.D.2d 941 (Donnellon v. Tofany) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Donnellon v. Tofany, 31 A.D.2d 941, 299 N.Y.S.2d 805, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4447 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of CPLR to annul respondent’s determination, dated February 1, 1967, which suspended petitioner’s driver’s license for 30 days as of January 28, 1967 for a violation of former paragraph 3 of subdivision (b) of section 1180 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law (now subd. [d] of said section), petition granted to the extent that the determination is modified, on the law, by reducing the period of suspension to the period of time during which the suspension was in effect, that is, up to February 9, 1967, the time of entry of the order of the Special Term which inter alia stayed the operation of the suspension; and determination confirmed as so modified, without costs. While it may not be said, on this record, that the determination was unsupported by substantial evidence, we believe that, under all the circumstances, suspension of petitioner’s license for 30 days was not warranted. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hopkins, Benjamin and Martuseello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of CPLR to annul respondent’s determination, dated February 1, 1967, which suspended petitioner’s driver’s license for 30 days as of January 28, 1967 for a violation of former paragraph 3 of subdivision (b) of section 1180 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law (now subd. [d] of said section), petition granted to the extent that the determination is modified, on the law, by reducing the period of suspension to the period of time during which the suspension was in effect, that is, up to February 9, 1967, the time of entry of the order of the Special Term which inter alia stayed the operation of the suspension; and determination confirmed as so modified, without costs. While it may not be said, on this record, that the determination was unsupported by substantial evidence, we believe that, under all the circumstances, suspension of petitioner’s license for 30 days was not warranted. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hopkins, Benjamin and Martuseello, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 A.D.2d 941, 299 N.Y.S.2d 805, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4447, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donnellon-v-tofany-nyappdiv-1969.