Donnell v. Cox

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Donnell v. Cox

81 S.E.2d 664, 240 N.C. 259, 1954 N.C. LEXIS 414

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedMay 5, 1954

Docket595

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 81 S.E.2d 664 (Donnell v. Cox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Donnell v. Cox, 81 S.E.2d 664, 240 N.C. 259, 1954 N.C. LEXIS 414 (N.C. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee CueiaM.

Tbe appellant assigns as error tbe findings of fact by tbe court below. However, tbe assignment is not supported by an excep *260 tion to snob findings, therefore, it is feckless. Worsley v. Rendering Co., 239 N.C. 547, 80 S.E. 2d 467; Wyatt v. Sharp, 239 N.C. 655, 80 S.E. 2d 762. Moreover, when no exception is taken to findings of fact, they are presumed to be supported by the evidence and are binding on appeal. Wyatt v. Sharp, supra, and cases cited therein.

The ruling of the court below is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee CueiaM.

Tbe appellant assigns as error tbe findings of fact by tbe court below. However, tbe assignment is not supported by an excep *260 tion to snob findings, therefore, it is feckless. Worsley v. Rendering Co., 239 N.C. 547, 80 S.E. 2d 467; Wyatt v. Sharp, 239 N.C. 655, 80 S.E. 2d 762. Moreover, when no exception is taken to findings of fact, they are presumed to be supported by the evidence and are binding on appeal. Wyatt v. Sharp, supra, and cases cited therein.

The ruling of the court below is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

81 S.E.2d 664, 240 N.C. 259, 1954 N.C. LEXIS 414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donnell-v-cox-nc-1954.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack