Home/Supreme Court of North Carolina/Donnell v. Cox

Donnell v. Cox

81 S.E.2d 664, 240 N.C. 259, 1954 N.C. LEXIS 414
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided May 5, 1954·No. 595·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Pee CueiaM.

Tbe appellant assigns as error tbe findings of fact by tbe court below. However, tbe assignment is not supported by an excep *260 tion to snob findings, therefore, it is feckless. Worsley v. Rendering Co., 239 N.C. 547, 80 S.E. 2d 467; Wyatt v. Sharp, 239 N.C. 655, 80 S.E. 2d 762. Moreover, when no exception is taken to findings of fact, they are presumed to be supported by the evidence and are binding on appeal. Wyatt v. Sharp, supra, and cases cited therein.

The ruling of the court below is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Donnell v. Cox, 81 S.E.2d 664, 240 N.C. 259, 1954 N.C. LEXIS 414 (N.C. 1954).

81 S.E.2d 664 (Donnell v. Cox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stancil v. Stancil
121 S.E.2d 882 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1961)
Bulman v. Southern Baptist Convention
103 S.E.2d 487 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1958)
City of Raleigh v. Morand
100 S.E.2d 870 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1957)
City of Goldsboro v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co.
97 S.E.2d 486 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1957)
Tillis v. Calvine Cotton Mills, Inc.
94 S.E.2d 600 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1956)
James v. Pretlow
86 S.E.2d 759 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1955)
Suits v. Old Equity Life Insurance Company
85 S.E.2d 602 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1955)
Moore v. Crosswell
82 S.E.2d 208 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1954)