Donna Haas v. Travelex Insurance Services Inc.

CourtDistrict Court, C.D. California
DecidedApril 6, 2021
Docket2:20-cv-06171
StatusUnknown

This text of Donna Haas v. Travelex Insurance Services Inc. (Donna Haas v. Travelex Insurance Services Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, C.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Donna Haas v. Travelex Insurance Services Inc., (C.D. Cal. 2021).

Opinion

1 POMERANTZ LLP Jordan L. Lurie, State Bar No. 130013 2 jllurie@pomlaw.com 3 Ari Y. Basser, State Bar No. 272618 abasser@pomlaw.com 4 1100 Glendon Avenue, 15th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90024 5 Telephone: (310) 432-8492

6 LAW OFFICES OF ZEV B. ZYSMAN 7 Zev B. Zysman, State Bar No. 176805 zev@zysmanlawca.com 8 A Professional Corporation 15760 Ventura Boulevard, 16th Floor 9 Encino, CA 91436 Telephone: (818)783-8836 10 Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Proposed Class(es) 11 CARLTON FIELDS, LLP 12 Steven B. Weisburd (SBN 171490) sweisburd@carltonfields.com 13 2029 Century Park East, Suite 1200 Los Angeles, CA 90067-2913 14 Telephone: (310) 843-6300

15 Attorneys for Defendants 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – WESTERN DIVISION 18 DONNA HAAS, on behalf of herself and Case No.: 2:20-cv-06171-ODW-PLA 19 all others similarly situated, CLASS ACTION 20 Plaintiff, DISCOVERY MATTER 21 vs. STIPULATED PROTECTIVE 22 TRAVELEX INSURANCE SERVICES ORDER INC., BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY 23 SPECIALITY INSURANCE COMPANY, and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 24 Defendants. 25 26

27 1 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Donna Haas 2 (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Travelex Insurance Services Inc. and Berkshire 3 Hathaway Specialty Insurance Company (hereafter “Travelex,” “Berkshire,” or 4 “Defendants”) (Plaintiff and Defendants are collectively referred to herein as the 5 “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel of record, that: 6 1. GENERAL 7 1.1 Purposes and Limitations. Discovery in this action is likely to involve 8 production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special 9 protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than 10 prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby 11 stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective 12 Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections 13 on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from 14 public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are 15 entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. The parties 16 further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below, that this Stipulated 17 Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under seal; 18 Civil Local Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the 19 standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file 20 material under seal. 21 1.2 Good Cause Statement. This action is likely to involve trade secrets, 22 customer and pricing lists and other valuable research, development, commercial, 23 financial, sensitive personal information, technical and/or proprietary information 24 for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose 25 other than prosecution of this action is warranted. Such confidential and proprietary 26 materials and information consist of, among other things, confidential personal 27 consumer information, confidential business or financial information, information 1 regarding confidential business practices, or other confidential research, 2 development, or commercial information (including information implicating privacy 3 rights of third parties), information otherwise generally unavailable to the public, or 4 which may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure under state or 5 federal statutes, court rules, case decisions, or common law. Accordingly, to 6 expedite the flow of information, to facilitate the prompt resolution of disputes over 7 confidentiality of discovery materials, to adequately protect information the parties 8 are entitled to keep confidential, to ensure that the parties are permitted reasonable 9 necessary uses of such material in preparation for and in the conduct of trial, to 10 address their handling at the end of the litigation, and serve the ends of justice, a 11 protective order for such information is justified in this matter. It is the intent of the 12 parties that information will not be designated as confidential for tactical reasons 13 and that nothing be so designated without a good faith belief that it has been 14 maintained in a confidential, non-public manner, and there is good cause why it 15 should not be part of the public record of this case. 16 2. DEFINITIONS 17 2.1 Action: Action means the above-entitled proceeding, Case No. 2:20-cv- 18 06171-ODW-PLA. 19 2.2 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of 20 information or items under this Order. 21 2.3 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how 22 it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection 23 under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and as specified above in the Good 24 Cause Statement. 25 2.4 Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as their 26 support staff). 27 1 2.5 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or 2 items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as 3 “CONFIDENTIAL.” 4 2.6 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of 5 the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, 6 among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or 7 generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 8 2.7 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter 9 pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as 10 an expert witness or as a consultant in this Action. 11 2.8 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this Action. 12 House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside 13 counsel. 14 2.9 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or 15 other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 16 2.10 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party 17 to this Action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this Action and have 18 appeared in this Action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm that 19 has appeared on behalf of that party, including support staff. 20 2.11 Party: for purposes of this Order only, Party shall mean any party to this 21 Action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, consultants, retained 22 experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs). 23 2.12 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or 24 Discovery Material in this Action. 25 2.13 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support 26 services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or 27 1 demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) 2 and their employees and subcontractors. 3 2.14 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is 4 designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 5 2.15 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material 6 from a Producing Party. 7 3. SCOPE 8 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only 9 Protected Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or 10 extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or 11 compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or 12 presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. Any 13 use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by the orders of the trial judge. 14 This Order does not govern the use of Protected Material at trial. 15 4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Donna Haas v. Travelex Insurance Services Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donna-haas-v-travelex-insurance-services-inc-cacd-2021.