Donna Gayle Holcomb v. State

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Donna Gayle Holcomb v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 9680
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 7, 2014·No. 01-08-00337-CR·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTIONS

Case number: 01-08-00337-CR

Style: Donna Gayle Holcomb, Appellant v. State of Texas, Appellee

Type: Motion to proceed pro se and motion to extend time to file motion for rehearing

Party filing motion: Appellant

Appellant’s motion to proceed pro se is denied, as appellant is represented by counsel and counsel has appeared on behalf of appellant in the Court of Criminal Appeals. The Court declines to rule on appellant’s motion to extend time to file a further motion for rehearing. See Robinson v. State, 240 SW3d 919, 922 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007) (holding that court may refuse to consider pro se motions that have been filed while defendant is represented by counsel in criminal proceeding).

Judge’s signature: /s/ Jane Bland Justice Bland Acting individually

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and Huddle.

Date: October 30, 2014.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Donna Gayle Holcomb v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Donna Gayle Holcomb v. State (Donna Gayle Holcomb v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Robinson v. State
240 S.W.3d 919 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2007)