Don/McC Cook/Solo v. Jeffrey Stieve

701 F. App'x 533
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedNovember 14, 2017
Docket16-3802
StatusUnpublished

This text of 701 F. App'x 533 (Don/McC Cook/Solo v. Jeffrey Stieve) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Don/McC Cook/Solo v. Jeffrey Stieve, 701 F. App'x 533 (8th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Arkansas prisoner Don/McC Cook/Solo (Solo) appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in favor of Dr. Jeffrey Stieve in this pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Upon careful de novo review, see United States v. Dico, Inc., 808 F.3d 342, 346 (8th Cir. 2015), we conclude that Solo demonstrated neither deliberate indifference nor unconstitutional retaliation by Dr. Stieve. See Meuir v. Greene Cty. Jail Emps., 487 F.3d 1115, 1118 (8th Cir. 2007) (prison physicians are free to exercise independent medical judgment); Long v. Nix, 86 F.3d 761, 765 (8th Cir. 1996) (prison officials do not violate Eighth Amendment when, in exercising professional judgment, they refuse to implement inmate’s requested course of treatment). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Joe J. Volpe, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Long v. Nix
86 F.3d 761 (Eighth Circuit, 1996)
United States v. Dico, Inc.
808 F.3d 342 (Eighth Circuit, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
701 F. App'x 533, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donmcc-cooksolo-v-jeffrey-stieve-ca8-2017.