Donmar Enterprises, Inc. v. Nissan North America, Inc.

Eleventh Circuit

Donmar Enterprises, Inc. v. Nissan North America, Inc.

185 F. App'x 873

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided June 22, 2006·No. No. 05-12949; D.C. Docket No. 03-00515 CV-J-99-TEM·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The record in this appeal reveals that the district court exceeded its jurisdiction in accepting the invitation of the parties to revise the “Mediated Settlement Agreement” (EXHIBIT A) when there existed unresolved disputed questions of fact as to the intention of the parties. The order appealed from is vacated and the cause is remanded to the District Court for an evidentiary hearing to determine the disputed questions regarding matters not covered by the said exhibit. Neither party to recover costs.

VACATED AND REMANDED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The record in this appeal reveals that the district court exceeded its jurisdiction in accepting the invitation of the parties to revise the “Mediated Settlement Agreement” (EXHIBIT A) when there existed unresolved disputed questions of fact as to the intention of the parties. The order appealed from is vacated and the cause is remanded to the District Court for an evidentiary hearing to determine the disputed questions regarding matters not covered by the said exhibit. Neither party to recover costs.

VACATED AND REMANDED

Donmar Enterprises, Inc. v. Nissan North America, Inc., 185 F. App'x 873 (11th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

185 F. App'x 873 (Donmar Enterprises, Inc. v. Nissan North America, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.