Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Donley v. State

Donley v. State

267 So. 3d 534
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 28, 2019
DocketNo. 1D18-3174
StatusPublished

This text of 267 So. 3d 534 (Donley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Donley v. State, 267 So. 3d 534 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Petitioner has filed a pro se petition for belated appeal following his conviction for trafficking in opium. To the extent Petitioner alleges ineffective assistance of appellate counsel on direct appeal, the petition *535is dismissed as untimely. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(d)(5). To the extent Petitioner complains about actions taken by counsel during postconviction proceedings, the petition is denied. See Tompkins v. State , 994 So.2d 1072, 1088 (Fla. 2008) (noting that claims of ineffective assistance of postconviction counsel are not cognizable).

Roberts, Ray, and Jay, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tompkins v. State
994 So. 2d 1072 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
267 So. 3d 534, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donley-v-state-fladistctapp-2019.