Doniger v. Norton

235 A.D. 704
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 15, 1932·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment modified by striking from the last paragraph thereof the words “ on the merits ” and by inserting in place thereof the words without prejudice.” In a new action it may be proved that money damages will amply compensate defendant, under the doctrine of Lacov v. Ocean Ave. Building Corp. (257 N. Y. 362) and equities in favor of the plaintiff in respect to the present and former character of the neighborhood may be more clearly established. As so modified the judgment is unanimously affirmed, with costs to respondent. The direction for judgment contained in the decision is modified accordingly. Present —• Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Seudder and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Doniger v. Norton, 235 A.D. 704 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

235 A.D. 704 (Doniger v. Norton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Empire Boulevard Bldrs., Inc. v. Spohn
235 A.D. 497 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1932)