D'Onfro Bros. v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

D'Onfro Bros. v. State

249 A.D. 699

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 20, 1936

DocketClaim No. 23676

StatusPublished

This text of 249 A.D. 699 (D'Onfro Bros. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

D'Onfro Bros. v. State, 249 A.D. 699 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

These are crossappeals, both by the claimant and by the State, from a judgment of the Court of Claims. The controversy is over a State road contract. The State claims that the judgment and decision are contrary to law and against the evidence and that the amount of the award is excessive. The contractor claims that the amount of the award for excavation and maintaining traffic and for injury to the roadbed are contrary to law and against the weight of evidence. A careful examination of the record does not disclose any facts that would warrant this court in disturbing the judgment appealed from. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

These are crossappeals, both by the claimant and by the State, from a judgment of the Court of Claims. The controversy is over a State road contract. The State claims that the judgment and decision are contrary to law and against the evidence and that the amount of the award is excessive. The contractor claims that the amount of the award for excavation and maintaining traffic and for injury to the roadbed are contrary to law and against the weight of evidence. A careful examination of the record does not disclose any facts that would warrant this court in disturbing the judgment appealed from. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

249 A.D. 699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donfro-bros-v-state-nyappdiv-1936.