Donel Salazar Jr. v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 28, 2018·No. 13-16-00630-CR·Published

Opinion

NUMBER 13-16-00630-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

DONEL SALAZAR JR., Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 370th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.

ORDER Before Justices Rodriguez, Contreras, and Hinojosa Order Per Curiam

Currently pending before the Court is appellant's motion for pro se access to the

appellate record. Appellant's counsel has filed an Anders brief herein, and appellant has

been unable to examine the record so that he can file a pro se brief.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the trial court ensure that appellant has the opportunity to fully examine the appellate record on or before April 23, 2018, and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the trial court notify this Court as to the date upon which the

appellate record was made available to appellant. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313

(Tex. Crim. App. 2014).

Appellant shall have thirty (30) days from the day the appellate record is first made

available to him to file his pro se brief with this Court. The State shall have twenty days

thereafter to file its response, if any.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the 28th day of March, 2018.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Donel Salazar Jr. v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Donel Salazar Jr. v. State (Donel Salazar Jr. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kelly, Sylvester
436 S.W.3d 313 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2014)