Donel Salazar Jr. v. State
Opinion
NUMBER 13-16-00630-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
DONEL SALAZAR JR., Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
On appeal from the 370th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.
ORDER Before Justices Rodriguez, Contreras, and Hinojosa Order Per Curiam
Currently pending before the Court is appellant's motion for pro se access to the
appellate record. Appellant's counsel has filed an Anders brief herein, and appellant has
been unable to examine the record so that he can file a pro se brief.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the trial court ensure that appellant has the opportunity to fully examine the appellate record on or before April 23, 2018, and it is
FURTHER ORDERED that the trial court notify this Court as to the date upon which the
appellate record was made available to appellant. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313
(Tex. Crim. App. 2014).
Appellant shall have thirty (30) days from the day the appellate record is first made
available to him to file his pro se brief with this Court. The State shall have twenty days
thereafter to file its response, if any.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed the 28th day of March, 2018.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Donel Salazar Jr. v. State (Donel Salazar Jr. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.