Donehoo v. Standifer

Supreme Court of Georgia

Donehoo v. Standifer

178 S.E. 455, 180 Ga. 181, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 212

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided January 19, 1935·No. No. 10239·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Russell, Chief Justice.

Under the facts alleged, this case is controlled by the decisions in Wallace v. Wallace, 142 Ga. 408 (2) (83 S. E. 113), Brown v. Parks, 169 Ga. 712 (151 S. E. 340, 71 A. L. R. 271), and Jackson v. Jackson, 179 Ga. 696 (177 S. E. 591), and is distinguished from Walker v. Hall, 176 Ga. 12 (166 S. E. 757), in which there were no sufficient allegations of fraud upon the court of ordinary. The court erred in sustaining the general demurrer and in dismissing the petition.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur. McElrealh & Scolt and George H. Perry, for plaintiff. Lowrey Slone and James TP. Harris, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russell, Chief Justice.

Under the facts alleged, this case is controlled by the decisions in Wallace v. Wallace, 142 Ga. 408 (2) (83 S. E. 113), Brown v. Parks, 169 Ga. 712 (151 S. E. 340, 71 A. L. R. 271), and Jackson v. Jackson, 179 Ga. 696 (177 S. E. 591), and is distinguished from Walker v. Hall, 176 Ga. 12 (166 S. E. 757), in which there were no sufficient allegations of fraud upon the court of ordinary. The court erred in sustaining the general demurrer and in dismissing the petition.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur. McElrealh & Scolt and George H. Perry, for plaintiff. Lowrey Slone and James TP. Harris, for defendants.

Donehoo v. Standifer, 178 S.E. 455, 180 Ga. 181, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 212 (Ga. 1935).

Pincite

178 S.E. 455 (Donehoo v. Standifer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related