Donehoo v. Standifer
This text of 178 S.E. 455 (Donehoo v. Standifer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Under the facts alleged, this case is controlled by the decisions in Wallace v. Wallace, 142 Ga. 408 (2) (83 S. E. 113), Brown v. Parks, 169 Ga. 712 (151 S. E. 340, 71 A. L. R. 271), and Jackson v. Jackson, 179 Ga. 696 (177 S. E. 591), and is distinguished from Walker v. Hall, 176 Ga. 12 (166 S. E. 757), in which there were no sufficient allegations of fraud upon the court of ordinary. The court erred in sustaining the general demurrer and in dismissing the petition.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
178 S.E. 455, 180 Ga. 181, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donehoo-v-standifer-ga-1935.