Donegan v. Consumer's Food & Royal Farms Supermarkets, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Donegan v. Consumer's Food & Royal Farms Supermarkets, Inc.

107 A.D.2d 791, 485 N.Y.S.2d 507, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42712

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 28, 1985

StatusPublished

This text of 107 A.D.2d 791 (Donegan v. Consumer's Food & Royal Farms Supermarkets, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Donegan v. Consumer's Food & Royal Farms Supermarkets, Inc., 107 A.D.2d 791, 485 N.Y.S.2d 507, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42712 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

— In an action to recover damages for false imprisonment and battery, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Clemente, J.), dated November 14, 1983, which conditionally precluded her from introducing the medical testimony, records and/or reports of Dr. Karl O. Pilgrim due to her failure to comply with the requirements of a precalendar order requiring their production on or before September 8, 1983.

Order affirmed, with costs.

It cannot be said that Special Term erred in requiring adherence to the rules of this court regarding the exchange of medical information in civil actions (22 NYCRR 672.8). O’Connor, J. P., Weinstein, Lawrence and Fiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an action to recover damages for false imprisonment and battery, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Clemente, J.), dated November 14, 1983, which conditionally precluded her from introducing the medical testimony, records and/or reports of Dr. Karl O. Pilgrim due to her failure to comply with the requirements of a precalendar order requiring their production on or before September 8, 1983.

Order affirmed, with costs.

It cannot be said that Special Term erred in requiring adherence to the rules of this court regarding the exchange of medical information in civil actions (22 NYCRR 672.8). O’Connor, J. P., Weinstein, Lawrence and Fiber, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

107 A.D.2d 791, 485 N.Y.S.2d 507, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42712, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donegan-v-consumers-food-royal-farms-supermarkets-inc-nyappdiv-1985.