Donegan v. Boylan

13 A.D.2d 979, 218 N.Y.S.2d 973, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10310

Opinion

In an action by plaintiffs for a judgment declaring that their respective premises are not subject to any restrictive covenants prohibiting the erection of a one-family dwelling thereon, and in which the answering defendants counterclaimed to enjoin the violation of such covenants, the said defendants appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered March 11, 1960, upon the decision of the court, after a nonjury trial, in favor of plaintiffs and dismissing the counterclaim of said defendants. Judgment affirmed, with costs. (Hungerford v. Ocean Gardens, 283 App. Div. 797, affd. 308 N. Y. 765; Tryon v. Spiegel, 8 A D 2d 219; Buffalo Academy of Sacred Heart v. Boehm Bros., 267 N. Y. 242.) Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Donegan v. Boylan, 13 A.D.2d 979, 218 N.Y.S.2d 973, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10310 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

13 A.D.2d 979 (Donegan v. Boylan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Buffalo Academy of Sacred Heart v. Boehm Bros.
196 N.E. 42 (New York Court of Appeals, 1935)
Hungerford v. Ocean Gardens, Inc.
283 A.D. 797 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1954)
Hungerford v. Ocean Gardens, Inc.
125 N.E.2d 114 (New York Court of Appeals, 1955)