Donegal Mutual Insurance v. Baumhammers

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Donegal Mutual Insurance v. Baumhammers

908 A.2d 265, 589 Pa. 248, 2006 Pa. LEXIS 1649

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided August 29, 2006·No. Appeal Nos. 110-125 WAL 2006·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[249]*249 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 29th day of August, 2006, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED. It is further ordered that oral argument will be limited to the issue of whether the Superior Court erred in holding that the alleged negligence constitutes six occurrences under the Donegal Mutual Insurance Company policy. The remaining issues will be considered on a submitted basis.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[249]*249 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 29th day of August, 2006, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED. It is further ordered that oral argument will be limited to the issue of whether the Superior Court erred in holding that the alleged negligence constitutes six occurrences under the Donegal Mutual Insurance Company policy. The remaining issues will be considered on a submitted basis.

Donegal Mutual Insurance v. Baumhammers, 908 A.2d 265, 589 Pa. 248, 2006 Pa. LEXIS 1649 (Pa. 2006).

Pincite

908 A.2d 265 (Donegal Mutual Insurance v. Baumhammers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related