Dondero v. Ferranti

3 A.2d 831, 90 N.H. 554, 1939 N.H. LEXIS 96
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedJanuary 3, 1939
DocketNo. 3043.
StatusPublished

This text of 3 A.2d 831 (Dondero v. Ferranti) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dondero v. Ferranti, 3 A.2d 831, 90 N.H. 554, 1939 N.H. LEXIS 96 (N.H. 1939).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is a proceeding in which a common-law action

of tort for embezzling funds and securities has been amended by a bill in equity for an accounting. The court’s finding that justice required the allowance of the amendment is not to be set aside merely because the defendant thereby lost her right to a jury trial of the action at law. A suit for an accounting has advantages over an action at law, when, as claimed here, an accounting by the defendant is necessary to ascertain the extent of her indebtedness. Equity does not lose its jurisdiction over accounting and discovery by reason of the common law’s adoption of equitable principles. Berry v. Whidden, 62 N. H. 473, 476.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Berry v. Whidden
62 N.H. 473 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1883)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 A.2d 831, 90 N.H. 554, 1939 N.H. LEXIS 96, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dondero-v-ferranti-nh-1939.