Donavan v. Mooney

5 La. 57
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedJanuary 15, 1833
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 5 La. 57 (Donavan v. Mooney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Donavan v. Mooney, 5 La. 57 (La. 1833).

Opinion

Martin, J.

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a redhibitory action, on the ground of the slave sold, being addicted to running away before the sale. The general issue was pleaded.

The District Court gave judgment for the plaintiff for the price paid for the slave, and three dollars paid for taking it, with interest from the judicial demand.

The plaintiff’s claim appears to us to have been fully established, but the defendant’s counsel has contended, that interest was improperly allowed.

Had interest been allowed before the suit was brought, we should have thought the plaintiff, having had some service from the slave, could not claim any thing from the absence of his money, but on the recision of the sale, the parties must be placed in the situation in which they were before it, and this cannot well be, unless the vendee receives back the price at once, or with interest till paid, and to this he becomes entitled, when he delivers or tenders the property.

It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the judgment be affirmed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. Williams
431 So. 2d 780 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1983)
Alexander v. Burroughs Corp.
359 So. 2d 607 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1978)
Davis v. Le Blanc
149 So. 2d 252 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 La. 57, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donavan-v-mooney-la-1833.