Donatone v. Hennings
This text of 21 Misc. 2d 283 (Donatone v. Hennings) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The answer was timely served and filed. The subsequent alleged default, inquest and judgment taken by plaintiff were improper. Defendant’s moving papers presented an adequate and meritorious defense to the cause of action stated by plaintiff.
The order should be reversed, with $10 costs to defendant, and motion granted, judgment vacated and case restored to General Calendar.
Concur — Hofstadter, J. P., Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ.
Order reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
21 Misc. 2d 283, 199 N.Y.S.2d 791, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donatone-v-hennings-nyappterm-1959.