Donato v. Kiendl

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Donato v. Kiendl

276 A.D.2d 1077

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 25, 1950

StatusPublished

This text of 276 A.D.2d 1077 (Donato v. Kiendl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Donato v. Kiendl, 276 A.D.2d 1077 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ.; Yan Yoorhis, J., concurring for affirmance upon the second ground stated in defendants’ notice of motion, that summary judgment dismissing the complaint was properly granted on the basis of the record in the Federal court action, which has the effect of documentary evidence establishing as matter of law that defenses of justification, and fair report and comment respecting judicial proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ.; Yan Yoorhis, J., concurring for affirmance upon the second ground stated in defendants’ notice of motion, that summary judgment dismissing the complaint was properly granted on the basis of the record in the Federal court action, which has the effect of documentary evidence establishing as matter of law that defenses of justification, and fair report and comment respecting judicial proceedings.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

276 A.D.2d 1077, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donato-v-kiendl-nyappdiv-1950.