Donato v. Hallock
173 A.D. 910
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 15, 1916
DocketAppeal No. 2
StatusPublished
This text of 173 A.D. 910 (Donato v. Hallock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Donato v. Hallock, 173 A.D. 910 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).
Opinion
—Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with costs, on authority oi Bachmann v. Spinghel (164 App. Div. 725). Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Staple-ton and Mills, JJ., concurred; Carr, J., not voting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bachmann v. Spinghel
164 A.D. 725 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1914)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
173 A.D. 910, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donato-v-hallock-nyappdiv-1916.