Donato Realty, LLC v. Utica First Insurance Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Donato Realty, LLC v. Utica First Insurance Co.

2017 NY Slip Op 112, 146 A.D.3d 481, 45 N.Y.S.3d 54

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 10, 2017·No. 2689 152419/12·Published

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shlomo Hagler, *482 J.), entered on or about July 15, 2016, which granted plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment declaring that defendant is obligated to defend and indemnify plaintiff Donato Realty, LLC in the underlying personal injury action, and denied defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment declaring that it is not so obligated, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The lease agreement between plaintiff Donato’s managing agent and the tenant required the tenant to maintain insurance for itself and Donato against “any liability arising out of the ownership, use, occupancy or maintenance of the demised premises and all areas appurtenant thereto,” which includes the sidewalk (see Tower Ins. Co. of N.Y. v Leading Ins. Group Ins. Co., Ltd., 134 AD3d 510 [1st Dept 2015]).

Defendant argues that Donato is not covered for the underlying personal injury, pursuant to the additional insured endorsement in the tenant’s policy, which excludes coverage for “any structural alteration” made on Donato’s behalf. However, the testimonial evidence indicates an unrepaired structural defect, rather than a structural alteration (see Leading Ins. Group Ins. Co., Ltd. v Greenwich Ins. Co., 44 Misc 3d 435, 444 [Sup Ct. Kings County 2014]). Moreover, the underlying complaint does not allege that the trip and fall was the result of repairs that had been made on Donato’s behalf.

Concur — Tom, J.P., Richter, Saxe, Gische and Gesmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shlomo Hagler, *482 J.), entered on or about July 15, 2016, which granted plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment declaring that defendant is obligated to defend and indemnify plaintiff Donato Realty, LLC in the underlying personal injury action, and denied defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment declaring that it is not so obligated, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The lease agreement between plaintiff Donato’s managing agent and the tenant required the tenant to maintain insurance for itself and Donato against “any liability arising out of the ownership, use, occupancy or maintenance of the demised premises and all areas appurtenant thereto,” which includes the sidewalk (see Tower Ins. Co. of N.Y. v Leading Ins. Group Ins. Co., Ltd., 134 AD3d 510 [1st Dept 2015]).

Defendant argues that Donato is not covered for the underlying personal injury, pursuant to the additional insured endorsement in the tenant’s policy, which excludes coverage for “any structural alteration” made on Donato’s behalf. However, the testimonial evidence indicates an unrepaired structural defect, rather than a structural alteration (see Leading Ins. Group Ins. Co., Ltd. v Greenwich Ins. Co., 44 Misc 3d 435, 444 [Sup Ct. Kings County 2014]). Moreover, the underlying complaint does not allege that the trip and fall was the result of repairs that had been made on Donato’s behalf.

Concur — Tom, J.P., Richter, Saxe, Gische and Gesmer, JJ.

Donato Realty, LLC v. Utica First Insurance Co., 2017 NY Slip Op 112, 146 A.D.3d 481, 45 N.Y.S.3d 54 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

2017 NY Slip Op 112 (Donato Realty, LLC v. Utica First Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related