Home/Supreme Court/Donat v. Honeycutt

Donat v. Honeycutt

134 S. Ct. 1790, 188 L. Ed. 2d 771, 572 U.S. 1053, 82 U.S.L.W. 3586, 2014 WL 1343661, 2014 U.S. LEXIS 2402
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedApril 7, 2014
DocketNo. 13–912.
StatusPublished

This text of 134 S. Ct. 1790 (Donat v. Honeycutt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Donat v. Honeycutt, 134 S. Ct. 1790, 188 L. Ed. 2d 771, 572 U.S. 1053, 82 U.S.L.W. 3586, 2014 WL 1343661, 2014 U.S. LEXIS 2402 (U.S. 2014).

Opinion

Case below, 535 Fed.Appx. 624.

Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States *1791Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Todd Honeycutt v. Bill Donat
535 F. App'x 624 (Ninth Circuit, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
134 S. Ct. 1790, 188 L. Ed. 2d 771, 572 U.S. 1053, 82 U.S.L.W. 3586, 2014 WL 1343661, 2014 U.S. LEXIS 2402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donat-v-honeycutt-scotus-2014.