Donannjim Corp. v. State

72 A.D.2d 869, 421 N.Y.S.2d 738, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14155

This text of 72 A.D.2d 869 (Donannjim Corp. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Donannjim Corp. v. State, 72 A.D.2d 869, 421 N.Y.S.2d 738, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14155 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Opinion

Motion by claimant-appellant for permission to prosecute appeal beyond the one-year period specified by 22 NYCRR 800.12. Motion denied, without costs, and appeal dismissed. The judgment of the Court of Claims is dated February 20, 1976. Pursuant to the rule, claimant-appellant’s appeal was deemed abandoned as of July 1, 1977 (see Hobs v State of New York, 53 AD2d 998). The allegation by counsel that his law firm was disrupted for two years by a pending dissolution is insufficient to excuse the delay which in this case is inordinate. Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Main and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hobbs v. State
53 A.D.2d 998 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
72 A.D.2d 869, 421 N.Y.S.2d 738, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donannjim-corp-v-state-nyappdiv-1979.