Donaldson v. State Personnel Board

391 P.2d 970, 64 Wash. 2d 368, 1964 Wash. LEXIS 343
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedApril 30, 1964
DocketNo. 36887
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 391 P.2d 970 (Donaldson v. State Personnel Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Donaldson v. State Personnel Board, 391 P.2d 970, 64 Wash. 2d 368, 1964 Wash. LEXIS 343 (Wash. 1964).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff, an employee in the office of the state auditor, commenced this action against the State Personnel Board to enjoin it from implementing a proposed amendment to the Merit System Rules, designated as Article XX, “Agreements Between Agencies and Employee Organizations.”

RCW 41.06.1501 provides, among other things, that the Board adopt rules regarding procedures for the establishment of

“. . . agreements between agencies and employee organizations providing for grievance procedures and collective negotiations on personnel matters, including wages, hours and working conditions, which may be peculiar to an agency; ...”

Plaintiff urges that the Board is attempting to act beyond its statutory power and that Article XX of the Merit System Rules is unconstitutional and void.

[369]*369The trial court dismissed the action and stated in its memorandum opinion:

“There is no controversy before this court which is ripe for judicial consideration. The plaintiff has not been harmed by the proposed rule and there is no present threat of harm to plaintiff. The courts do not exist to issue advisory opinions nor to decide controversies which do not exist.”

We agree with the trial court. Plaintiff has failed to establish facts sufficient to support a conclusion that any right or privilege of his has been interfered with or impaired, or is immediately threatened to be interfered with or impaired as required by RCW 34.04.070. The touchstone of justiciability is injury to a legally protected right.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

STATE EMPLOYEES v. Personnel Bd.
557 P.2d 336 (Washington Supreme Court, 1976)
Rosso v. State Personnel Board
411 P.2d 138 (Washington Supreme Court, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
391 P.2d 970, 64 Wash. 2d 368, 1964 Wash. LEXIS 343, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donaldson-v-state-personnel-board-wash-1964.